If you still don't know which of our services your case falls into – contact us!
Contact us
In today's dynamic economy, the market is saturated with brands of all kinds, competing for consumer attention. In this highly competitive environment, the risk of overlapping names and visual identities is enormous.
This is where trademark opposition is a key legal procedure that allows owners of older trademarks to protect their investments and reputation. The formal opposition is the main filter that ensures that new applications do not threaten the business of already established companies, preventing market confusion and unfair competition in the bud.
The initiation of an opposition procedure is based on specific legal grounds that aim to protect consumers from being misled. These grounds are defined both in our national legislation and in EU regulations, ensuring stability of trade turnover.
The main reasons for filing an opposition include:
The opposition procedure is an administrative process that is activated immediately after a successful formal examination and publication of the application in the Official Gazette. From this moment on, the fatal three-month period begins, during which any owner of an older trademark can object to the registration of the new one.
The process goes through several stages: a check on the admissibility of the opposition, a period for voluntary agreement, and an exchange of opinions and evidence between the parties.
Finally, the department issues a decision that may fully or partially refuse the registration of the new brand.
Percentage of challenged trademarks in Bulgaria and the EU. The data in the table is based on information from annual reports of the Bulgarian Patent Office and EUIPO (2023-2024).
| Territory | Total number of applications (annual) | Percentage of oppositions filed | Average dispute duration |
| Bulgaria (Patent Office) | ~3,500 - 4,000 | 12% - 15% | 8 - 14 months |
| European Union (EUIPO) | ~170,000+ | 18% - 22% | 18 - 24 months |
The statistics in the table clearly show that the risk of opposition is significant. In Bulgaria, between 121% and 151% of applications encounter opposition, while in the European Union (EUIPO) this percentage is even higher – up to 221%.
The difference in the duration of disputes is also striking: while in our country the procedure takes an average of up to 14 months, at the European level complex cases can last up to two years. These figures confirm that opposition is not an exception, but rather a regular practice that requires serious preparation and professional representation.
When an opposition is filed against your application, the first step is formal notification. The patent office (or EUIPO for European trade marks) sends a communication to the applicant or his representative, providing a copy of the opposition.
It is important not to panic, but to analyze the arguments of the other party. The procedure provides for the so-called "cooling off period", which is an excellent opportunity for an out-of-court settlement. Through reasonable negotiations, you can limit the list of goods or conclude a coexistence agreement, which saves time and huge costs.
If no agreement is reached, the actual proof phase begins. One of the strongest defenses is the request for proof of actual use of the older trademark (if it was registered more than 5 years ago).
If the opponent fails to provide invoices, advertising materials or proof of sales, his opposition will be automatically rejected.
At this stage, a professional response is key, as any omitted statement or poorly formed evidence can lead to the final rejection of your trademark.
Preliminary research is the surest way to avoid the opposition procedure before it even begins.
The main goal here is a detailed analysis of the so-called "likelihood of confusion" - a complex indicator that takes into account the visual, phonetic and semantic similarity between your brand and existing ones.
If you skip this step, you risk not only the refusal of the registration, but also serious financial losses for rebranding and legal fees. A professional study identifies potential conflicts in the bud and gives you the opportunity to adjust your strategy in time.
For all aspects and steps of the procedure trademark check read here.
Understanding the reasons for opposition success is essential for predicting the outcome of any legal dispute. The data in the table below is derived through a detailed statistical analysis of case law and patent office decisions, focusing on the most frequently applied legal grounds.
It is evident that visual and phonetic similarity dominate with 65%, as the direct similarity between the names most easily creates a "likelihood of confusion" in the consumer. In these cases, experts examine not only the spelling, but also the sound of the words, since auditory perception in advertising or conversation often leads to erroneous associations between two brands.
| Reason for successful opposition | Frequency | Description |
| Visual and phonetic similarity | 65% | Identical or similar names/logos in the same class of goods. |
| Similarity of goods/services | 20% | The brands are different, but they serve the same market niche. |
| Presence of a well-known brand | 10% | Protection of brands with high intensity of use (e.g. big brands). |
| Others (abuse of right, etc.) | 5% | Specific legal cases |
The similarity of the goods (20%) is also a strong motive, since even with different brands, offering them in the same market niche may harm the interests of the older right holder.
The presence of a well-known mark, even with 10%, ensures an exceptionally high success rate due to the enhanced legal protection of brands with high intensity of use. This special protection applies even when the new application is for a completely different type of product, in order to prevent unfairly taking advantage of the prestige of the established brand.
The remaining 5%s cover specific cases such as abuse of rights. These include cases of so-called "bad faith registrations", where the application is filed with the sole purpose of hindering a competitor or extorting the owner of a similar business. Another example is the attempts of former sales representatives to register their partner's trademark in their own name without explicit consent.
A failed defense in an opposition proceeding can have serious, and sometimes irreversible, consequences for a company's business strategy and financial stability. The loss of such a proceeding often leads to a chain reaction of negative events:
*Final refusal of registration: The patent office refuses to issue a trademark certificate for all or part of the classes of goods and services applied for. This means that the investment in the procedure up to this point is lost.
Loss of exclusivity and market vulnerability: Without registration, you do not have the exclusive right to the name. Any competitor can use a similar brand, and you have no legal basis to stop them.
Risk of lawsuits for infringement of third-party rights: If the opposition is upheld due to similarity to an older mark, continued use of your brand on the market may be considered infringement. This opens the door to claims for damages and a judicial suspension of your commercial activity.
Huge rebranding costs: The most severe consequence is often the need to completely change the visual identity. This includes destroying already produced packaging, replacing advertising materials, signs and branded clothing, as well as purchasing new domains.
Filing and defending a trademark opposition are not just filling out documents, but strategic legal battles that require deep knowledge of the practice of the Patent Office and EUIPO.
The lawyers and attorneys at IPfabrika have experience with diverse and complex cases, having successfully defended the interests of dozens of clients both in Bulgaria and internationally. Contact us for a consultation! We don't just submit opinions, we build a comprehensive strategy that minimizes risks and guarantees the stability of your business in the long term.
